Re: [PATCH for-rc 0/2] IB/hfi1: Fixes for rc or next if too late

[Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 11:29 -0700, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> Hi Doug and Jason,
> 
> We have two more late breaking fix up patches. The DMA_RTAIL fix is the more
> serious of the two. I realize we are at the tail end of 4.17 so I would not be
> against holding off till 4.18 for these, but if there is another rdma
> pull request we may want to tack these on.
> 
> ---
> 
> Kaike Wan (1):
>       IB/hfi1: Ensure VL index is within bounds
> 
> Mike Marciniszyn (1):
>       IB/hfi1: Fix user context tail allocation for DMA_RTAIL
> 
> 
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip.c     |    8 ++++----
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/file_ops.c |    2 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c     |    9 ++++-----
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/sdma.c     |   12 +++---------
>  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> -Denny

Hi Denny,

These two patches look fine in terms of the patches themselves.  In
terms of whether to put them in for-rc or for-next, what's the
consequences of hitting each of these bugs?

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
    GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
    Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part