On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:07:17AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > > On 5/30/2018 1:19 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > >On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 06:11:18PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >> > >>Jason, > >> > >>>>we must wait until Martin PR for sure... > >>> > >>>Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that > >>>case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter > >>>this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go > >>>to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured > >>>series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the > >>>dependencies! > >> > >>I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can > >>funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me. > > > >Sure, if you can still do that.. Max can you send me all four patches > >tomorrow and I'll route them through rdma. > > Yes sure. I'm sorry for the ping-pong, I've tried to cover this in the cover > letter but I guess I should've mentioned specifically what patches goes > through which tree. Just in general don't send such a jumble of patches for multiple maintainers under one cover letter. It is error prone to sort it out. Jason
