3.2.102-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
commit d85739367c6d56e475c281945c68fdb05ca74b4c upstream.
This is a fix for a (sort of) fallout in the recent commit
d15d662e89fc ("ALSA: seq: Fix racy pool initializations") for
CVE-2018-1000004.
As the pool resize deletes the existing cells, it may lead to a race
when another thread is writing concurrently, eventually resulting a
UAF.
A simple workaround is not to allow the pool resizing when the pool is
in use. It's an invalid behavior in anyway.
Fixes: d15d662e89fc ("ALSA: seq: Fix racy pool initializations")
Reported-by: 范龙飞 <long7573@xxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Nicolai Stange <nstange@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c
+++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c
@@ -1917,6 +1917,9 @@ static int snd_seq_ioctl_set_client_pool
(! snd_seq_write_pool_allocated(client) ||
info.output_pool != client->pool->size)) {
if (snd_seq_write_pool_allocated(client)) {
+ /* is the pool in use? */
+ if (atomic_read(&client->pool->counter))
+ return -EBUSY;
/* remove all existing cells */
snd_seq_pool_mark_closing(client->pool);
snd_seq_queue_client_leave_cells(client->number);
