4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 7801c545e706674aeed40256eb806ad37b18ad71 ]
If power domain information are missing in the device tree, no
power domains get initialized. However, imx_gpc_remove tries to
remove power domains always in the old DT binding case. Only
remove power domains when imx_gpc_probe initialized them in
first place.
Fixes: 721cabf6c660 ("soc: imx: move PGC handling to a new GPC driver")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
@@ -456,13 +456,21 @@ static int imx_gpc_probe(struct platform
static int imx_gpc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
+ struct device_node *pgc_node;
int ret;
+ pgc_node = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, "pgc");
+
+ /* bail out if DT too old and doesn't provide the necessary info */
+ if (!of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "#power-domain-cells") &&
+ !pgc_node)
+ return 0;
+
/*
* If the old DT binding is used the toplevel driver needs to
* de-register the power domains
*/
- if (!of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, "pgc")) {
+ if (!pgc_node) {
of_genpd_del_provider(pdev->dev.of_node);
ret = pm_genpd_remove(&imx_gpc_domains[GPC_PGC_DOMAIN_PU].base);
