4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 746d024c3211813946b319411aeb2b47767f8fb0 ]
gcc-8 reports that we access an array with a negative index
in an error case:
drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c: In function 'ipu_prg_channel_disable':
drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c:252:43: error: array subscript -22 is below array bounds of 'struct ipu_prg_channel[3]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
This moves the range check in front of the first time that
variable gets used.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c
@@ -252,10 +252,14 @@ void ipu_prg_channel_disable(struct ipuv
{
int prg_chan = ipu_prg_ipu_to_prg_chan(ipu_chan->num);
struct ipu_prg *prg = ipu_chan->ipu->prg_priv;
- struct ipu_prg_channel *chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan];
+ struct ipu_prg_channel *chan;
u32 val;
- if (!chan->enabled || prg_chan < 0)
+ if (prg_chan < 0)
+ return;
+
+ chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan];
+ if (!chan->enabled)
return;
clk_prepare_enable(prg->clk_ipg);
@@ -282,13 +286,15 @@ int ipu_prg_channel_configure(struct ipu
{
int prg_chan = ipu_prg_ipu_to_prg_chan(ipu_chan->num);
struct ipu_prg *prg = ipu_chan->ipu->prg_priv;
- struct ipu_prg_channel *chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan];
+ struct ipu_prg_channel *chan;
u32 val;
int ret;
if (prg_chan < 0)
return prg_chan;
+ chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan];
+
if (chan->enabled) {
ipu_pre_update(prg->pres[chan->used_pre], *eba);
return 0;
