On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:50:11PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 24-05-18 11:38:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > Just one objection: Why does stable care about this (and the previous > patch)? I've checked the stable queue and I don't see anything that would > have these patches as a prerequisite. And on their own, they are only > cleanups without substantial gains. There's a small gain here: > > paralleldd > > 4.4.0 4.4.0 > > vanilla avoidlock > > Amean Elapsd-1 5.28 ( 0.00%) 5.15 ( 2.50%) > > Amean Elapsd-4 5.29 ( 0.00%) 5.17 ( 2.12%) > > Amean Elapsd-7 5.28 ( 0.00%) 5.18 ( 1.78%) > > Amean Elapsd-12 5.20 ( 0.00%) 5.33 ( -2.50%) > > Amean Elapsd-21 5.14 ( 0.00%) 5.21 ( -1.41%) > > Amean Elapsd-30 5.30 ( 0.00%) 5.12 ( 3.38%) > > Amean Elapsd-48 5.78 ( 0.00%) 5.42 ( 6.21%) > > Amean Elapsd-79 6.78 ( 0.00%) 6.62 ( 2.46%) > > Amean Elapsd-110 9.09 ( 0.00%) 8.99 ( 1.15%) > > Amean Elapsd-128 10.60 ( 0.00%) 10.43 ( 1.66%) > > > > The impact is small but intuitively, it makes sense to avoid unnecessary > > calls to lock_page. Yes, it's small, but it's marked in the SLES kernel as "needs to be merged into stable", so obviously it matters to someone :) thanks, greg k-h
