On Thursday, October 31, 2013 05:08:50 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:39:21PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, October 31, 2013 09:07:40 AM Lv Zheng wrote: > > > There are bug-fixes for AML interpreter upstreamed, fixing some serious > > > issues found in recent platforms. These fixes make Linux AML interpreter > > > more ACPI 2.0 ASL concept compliant. Further AML interpreter fixes should > > > be based on such improvements, thus they are good materials for stable. > > > > > > This patch set can be safely applied to linux-3.8: > > > commit 19f949f52599ba7c3f67a5897ac6be14bfcb1200 upstream. > > > > > > The patch set has passed build/boot tests on the following machines: > > > Dell Inspiron Mini 1010 (i386) > > > HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (x86-64) > > > > > > Bob Moore (4): > > > ACPICA: Interpreter: Fix Store() when implicit conversion is not > > > possible. > > > ACPICA: DeRefOf operator: Update to fully resolve FieldUnit and > > > BufferField refs. > > > ACPICA: Return error if DerefOf resolves to a null package element. > > > ACPICA: Fix for a Store->ArgX when ArgX contains a reference to a > > > field. > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > Please take patches [1-4/4] for stable. > > "Which" stable tree? > > I don't do 3.8, it's long been end-of-life, although one company is > trying to keep it alive, but that's not me. > > I'm only handling 3.4, 3.10, and 3.11 stable trees right now, which > one(s) should these be applied to? 3.10.x and 3.11.x then. Lv, do the original mainline commits apply to these kernels? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html