4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kumar Sanghvi <kumaras@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 849a742c59a3d597473c0232f9c2506c69eeef14 ]
Earlier code of doing bitwise AND with field width bits was wrong.
Instead, simplify code to calculate ntuple_mask based on supplied
fields and then compare with mask configured in hw - which is the
correct and simpler way to validate ntuple mask.
Fixes: 3eb8b62d5a26 ("cxgb4: add support to create hash-filters via tc-flower offload")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Sanghvi <kumaras@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_filter.c | 88 +++++++---------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_filter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_filter.c
@@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ bool is_filter_exact_match(struct adapte
{
struct tp_params *tp = &adap->params.tp;
u64 hash_filter_mask = tp->hash_filter_mask;
- u32 mask;
+ u64 ntuple_mask = 0;
if (!is_hashfilter(adap))
return false;
@@ -865,73 +865,45 @@ bool is_filter_exact_match(struct adapte
if (!fs->val.fport || fs->mask.fport != 0xffff)
return false;
- if (tp->fcoe_shift >= 0) {
- mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->fcoe_shift) & FT_FCOE_W;
- if (mask && !fs->mask.fcoe)
- return false;
- }
+ /* calculate tuple mask and compare with mask configured in hw */
+ if (tp->fcoe_shift >= 0)
+ ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.fcoe << tp->fcoe_shift;
- if (tp->port_shift >= 0) {
- mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->port_shift) & FT_PORT_W;
- if (mask && !fs->mask.iport)
- return false;
- }
+ if (tp->port_shift >= 0)
+ ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.iport << tp->port_shift;
if (tp->vnic_shift >= 0) {
- mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->vnic_shift) & FT_VNIC_ID_W;
-
- if ((adap->params.tp.ingress_config & VNIC_F)) {
- if (mask && !fs->mask.pfvf_vld)
- return false;
- } else {
- if (mask && !fs->mask.ovlan_vld)
- return false;
- }
+ if ((adap->params.tp.ingress_config & VNIC_F))
+ ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.pfvf_vld << tp->vnic_shift;
+ else
+ ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.ovlan_vld <<
+ tp->vnic_shift;
}
- if (tp->vlan_shift >= 0) {
- mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->vlan_shift) & FT_VLAN_W;
- if (mask && !fs->mask.ivlan)
- return false;
- }
+ if (tp->vlan_shift >= 0)
+ ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.ivlan << tp->vlan_shift;
- if (tp->tos_shift >= 0) {
- mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->tos_shift) & FT_TOS_W;
- if (mask && !fs->mask.tos)
- return false;
- }
+ if (tp->tos_shift >= 0)
+ ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.tos << tp->tos_shift;
- if (tp->protocol_shift >= 0) {
- mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->protocol_shift) & FT_PROTOCOL_W;
- if (mask && !fs->mask.proto)
- return false;
- }
+ if (tp->protocol_shift >= 0)
+ ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.proto << tp->protocol_shift;
- if (tp->ethertype_shift >= 0) {
- mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->ethertype_shift) &
- FT_ETHERTYPE_W;
- if (mask && !fs->mask.ethtype)
- return false;
- }
+ if (tp->ethertype_shift >= 0)
+ ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.ethtype << tp->ethertype_shift;
- if (tp->macmatch_shift >= 0) {
- mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->macmatch_shift) & FT_MACMATCH_W;
- if (mask && !fs->mask.macidx)
- return false;
- }
+ if (tp->macmatch_shift >= 0)
+ ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.macidx << tp->macmatch_shift;
+
+ if (tp->matchtype_shift >= 0)
+ ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.matchtype << tp->matchtype_shift;
+
+ if (tp->frag_shift >= 0)
+ ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.frag << tp->frag_shift;
+
+ if (ntuple_mask != hash_filter_mask)
+ return false;
- if (tp->matchtype_shift >= 0) {
- mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->matchtype_shift) &
- FT_MPSHITTYPE_W;
- if (mask && !fs->mask.matchtype)
- return false;
- }
- if (tp->frag_shift >= 0) {
- mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->frag_shift) &
- FT_FRAGMENTATION_W;
- if (mask && !fs->mask.frag)
- return false;
- }
return true;
}
