4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 17556cdbe6ed70a6a20e597b228628f7f34387f8 ]
Commit 8f18c8a48b73 ("staging: lustre: lmv: separate master object
with master stripe") changed how lmo_root inodes were managed,
particularly when LMV_HASH_FLAG_MIGRATION is not set.
Previously lsm_md_oinfo[0].lmo_root was always a borrowed
inode reference and didn't need to by iput().
Since the change, that special case only applies when
LMV_HASH_FLAG_MIGRATION is set
In the upstream (lustre-release) version of this patch [Commit
60e07b972114 ("LU-4690 lod: separate master object with master
stripe")] the for loop in the lmv_unpack_md() was changed to count
from 0 and to ignore entry 0 if LMV_HASH_FLAG_MIGRATION is set.
In the patch that got applied to Linux, that change was missing,
so lsm_md_oinfo[0].lmo_root is never iput().
This results in a "VFS: Busy inodes" warning at unmount.
Fixes: 8f18c8a48b73 ("staging: lustre: lmv: separate master object with master stripe")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lmv/lmv_obd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lmv/lmv_obd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lmv/lmv_obd.c
@@ -2695,7 +2695,7 @@ static int lmv_unpackmd(struct obd_expor
if (lsm && !lmm) {
int i;
- for (i = 1; i < lsm->lsm_md_stripe_count; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < lsm->lsm_md_stripe_count; i++) {
/*
* For migrating inode, the master stripe and master
* object will be the same, so do not need iput, see
