4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
commit 569ccae68b38654f04b6842b034aa33857f605fe upstream.
rules in nftables a free'd using kfree, but protected by rcu, i.e. we
must wait for a grace period to elapse.
Normal removal patch does this, but nf_tables_newrule() doesn't obey
this rule during error handling.
It calls nft_trans_rule_add() *after* linking rule, and, if that
fails to allocate memory, it unlinks the rule and then kfree() it --
this is unsafe.
Switch order -- first add rule to transaction list, THEN link it
to public list.
Note: nft_trans_rule_add() uses GFP_KERNEL; it will not fail so this
is not a problem in practice (spotted only during code review).
Fixes: 0628b123c96d12 ("netfilter: nfnetlink: add batch support and use it from nf_tables")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -2200,41 +2200,46 @@ static int nf_tables_newrule(struct net
}
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE) {
- if (nft_is_active_next(net, old_rule)) {
- trans = nft_trans_rule_add(&ctx, NFT_MSG_DELRULE,
- old_rule);
- if (trans == NULL) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
- goto err2;
- }
- nft_deactivate_next(net, old_rule);
- chain->use--;
- list_add_tail_rcu(&rule->list, &old_rule->list);
- } else {
+ if (!nft_is_active_next(net, old_rule)) {
err = -ENOENT;
goto err2;
}
- } else if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_APPEND)
- if (old_rule)
- list_add_rcu(&rule->list, &old_rule->list);
- else
- list_add_tail_rcu(&rule->list, &chain->rules);
- else {
- if (old_rule)
- list_add_tail_rcu(&rule->list, &old_rule->list);
- else
- list_add_rcu(&rule->list, &chain->rules);
- }
+ trans = nft_trans_rule_add(&ctx, NFT_MSG_DELRULE,
+ old_rule);
+ if (trans == NULL) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err2;
+ }
+ nft_deactivate_next(net, old_rule);
+ chain->use--;
+
+ if (nft_trans_rule_add(&ctx, NFT_MSG_NEWRULE, rule) == NULL) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err2;
+ }
- if (nft_trans_rule_add(&ctx, NFT_MSG_NEWRULE, rule) == NULL) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
- goto err3;
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&rule->list, &old_rule->list);
+ } else {
+ if (nft_trans_rule_add(&ctx, NFT_MSG_NEWRULE, rule) == NULL) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err2;
+ }
+
+ if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_APPEND) {
+ if (old_rule)
+ list_add_rcu(&rule->list, &old_rule->list);
+ else
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&rule->list, &chain->rules);
+ } else {
+ if (old_rule)
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&rule->list, &old_rule->list);
+ else
+ list_add_rcu(&rule->list, &chain->rules);
+ }
}
chain->use++;
return 0;
-err3:
- list_del_rcu(&rule->list);
err2:
nf_tables_rule_destroy(&ctx, rule);
err1:
