[PATCH 4.9 60/87] seccomp: Use PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit b849a812f7eb92e96d1c8239b06581b2cfd8b275 upstream

Use PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE in seccomp() because seccomp does not allow to
widen restrictions.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/seccomp.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static inline void spec_mitigate(struct
 	int state = arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_get(task, which);
 
 	if (state > 0 && (state & PR_SPEC_PRCTL))
-		arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(task, which, PR_SPEC_DISABLE);
+		arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(task, which, PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE);
 }
 
 static inline void seccomp_assign_mode(struct task_struct *task,





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux