On 17 May 2018 at 06:08, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 16-05-18, 20:18, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> With commit 8f111bc357aa ("cpufreq/schedutil: Rewrite CPUFREQ_RT support")
>> schedutil governor uses rq->rt.rt_nr_running to detect whether a RT task is
>> currently running on the CPU and to set frequency to max if necessary.
>> cpufreq_update_util() is called in enqueue/dequeue_top_rt_rq() but
>> rq->rt.rt_nr_running as not been updated yet when dequeue_top_rt_rq() is
>> called so schedutil still considers that a RT task is running when the
>> last task is dequeued. The update of rq->rt.rt_nr_running happens later
>> in dequeue_rt_stack()
>>
>> Fixes: 8f111bc357aa ('cpufreq/schedutil: Rewrite CPUFREQ_RT support')
>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.16+
>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/rt.c | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
>> index 7aef6b4..6e74d3d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
>> @@ -1001,8 +1001,6 @@ dequeue_top_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
>> sub_nr_running(rq, rt_rq->rt_nr_running);
>> rt_rq->rt_queued = 0;
>>
>
> Remove this blank line as well ?
Yes good point
>
>> - /* Kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
>> - cpufreq_update_util(rq, 0);
>> }
>>
>> static void
>> @@ -1288,6 +1286,9 @@ static void dequeue_rt_stack(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
>> if (on_rt_rq(rt_se))
>> __dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
>> }
>> +
>> + /* Kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
>> + cpufreq_update_util(rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq_of_se(back)), 0);
>> }
>>
>> static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>
> --
> viresh
