On 5/3/2018 2:13 AM, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > mm/kmemleak.c: wait for scan completion before disabling free > > to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at: > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > The filename of the patch is: > mm-kmemleak.c-wait-for-scan-completion-before-disabling-free.patch > and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory. > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. > > > From foo@baz Wed May 2 13:21:44 PDT 2018 > From: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:01:16 -0700 > Subject: mm/kmemleak.c: wait for scan completion before disabling free > > From: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > [ Upstream commit 914b6dfff790544d9b77dfd1723adb3745ec9700 ] > > A crash is observed when kmemleak_scan accesses the object->pointer, > likely due to the following race. > > TASK A TASK B TASK C > kmemleak_write > (with "scan" and > NOT "scan=on") > kmemleak_scan() > create_object > kmem_cache_alloc fails > kmemleak_disable > kmemleak_do_cleanup > kmemleak_free_enabled = 0 > kfree > kmemleak_free bails out > (kmemleak_free_enabled is 0) > slub frees object->pointer > update_checksum > crash - object->pointer > freed (DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) > > kmemleak_do_cleanup waits for the scan thread to complete, but not for > direct call to kmemleak_scan via kmemleak_write. So add a wait for > kmemleak_scan completion before disabling kmemleak_free, and while at it > fix the comment on stop_scan_thread. > > [vinmenon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: fix stop_scan_thread comment] > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1522219972-22809-1-git-send-email-vinmenon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1522063429-18992-1-git-send-email-vinmenon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/kmemleak.c | 12 +++++++----- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > --- a/mm/kmemleak.c > +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c > @@ -1481,8 +1481,7 @@ static void start_scan_thread(void) > } > > /* > - * Stop the automatic memory scanning thread. This function must be called > - * with the scan_mutex held. > + * Stop the automatic memory scanning thread. > */ > static void stop_scan_thread(void) > { > @@ -1746,12 +1745,15 @@ static void kmemleak_do_cleanup(struct w > mutex_lock(&scan_mutex); > stop_scan_thread(); > > + mutex_lock(&scan_mutex); The lock is taken once above stop_scan_thread() and can result in a deadlock. The lock was removed from kmemleak_do_cleanup by following commit which is not present on 3.18 commit 5f369f374ba4889fe3c17883402db5ee8d254216 Author: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed Jun 24 16:58:31 2015 -0700 mm: kmemleak: do not acquire scan_mutex in kmemleak_do_cleanup() So we may have to pick the above patch too. > /* > - * Once the scan thread has stopped, it is safe to no longer track > - * object freeing. Ordering of the scan thread stopping and the memory > - * accesses below is guaranteed by the kthread_stop() function. > + * Once it is made sure that kmemleak_scan has stopped, it is safe to no > + * longer track object freeing. Ordering of the scan thread stopping and > + * the memory accesses below is guaranteed by the kthread_stop() > + * function. > */ > kmemleak_free_enabled = 0; > + mutex_unlock(&scan_mutex); > > if (!kmemleak_found_leaks) > __kmemleak_do_cleanup(); > > > Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from vinmenon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are > > queue-3.18/mm-kmemleak.c-wait-for-scan-completion-before-disabling-free.patch