Hi Dan, On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:11:15AM -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > Please drop 'drm/sun4i: rgb: Fix potential division by zero' from > 4.9.y/4.14.y. > > CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.o > ../drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.c: In function ‘sun4i_rgb_mode_valid’: > ../drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.c:96:6: error: ‘struct sun4i_tcon’ has no member named ‘dclk_min_div’ > tcon->dclk_min_div = 6; > ^~ > ../drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.c:97:6: error: ‘struct sun4i_tcon’ has no member named ‘dclk_max_div’ > tcon->dclk_max_div = 127; > ^~ > make[5]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:294: drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.o] Error 1 > make[4]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:544: drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i] Error 2 > make[3]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:544: drivers/gpu/drm] Error 2 > make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:544: drivers/gpu] Error 2 > make[1]: *** [/home/drue/src/linux/4.9-rc/Makefile:1006: drivers] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/drue/src/linux/4.9-rc/build-arm' > make: *** [Makefile:152: sub-make] Error 2 > > Greg - is there a way that I can tell which build and boot problems > 0-day is reporting so that I don't duplicate work on either of our > sides? Yeah, it turns out we were missing a patch as a dependency. What's the process for that, should we revert and resend, or should we send the missing patch ? Sorry for that... Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
