On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:23:11PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:26:35AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > How about only reporting problems? Having tests "pass" is the norm and > > should always happen, right? That would make the reports smaller. > I agree, though I would like to provide a bit of context so that people > new to the process have some idea about testing breadth and depth - but > it should be a few lines, rather than the hundreds that we have now. If you link to the web site people can in theory look there (obviously there's some work going on with the website to make it more readily digestible) for more context.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature