Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] PCI: hv: Serialize the present and eject work items" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:06:01AM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 06:23
> > 
> > Dexuan,
> > 
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:15:06PM +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
> > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> > 
> > Please do as Greg asks in order to complete the stable backport you
> > have requested.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Lorenzo
> > 
> > > greg k-h
> 
> Hi Greg, Lorenzo,
> It turns out that Hyper-V vPCI driver (drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c) in v4.9.y
> is broken on latest Hyper-V hosts, because it lacks more fixes, e.g. at least
> we must cherry-pick these 2 extra fixes:
> 7dcf90e PCI: hv: Use vPCI protocol version 1.2
> b1db7e7 PCI: hv: Add vPCI version protocol negotiation
> 
> Otherwise, we always get a "hv_pci ... Request for interrupt failed: 0xc0350005"
> error, as reported in https://github.com/Microsoft/azure-linux-kernel/issues/13.
> 
> The 2 extra fixes depend on a few more patches, and a manual resolution of
> conflicts is required...
> 
> Backporting all the required patches to v4.9 seems too many. IMO we may as
> well simply drop this patch ("PCI: hv: Serialize the present and eject work items")
> for v4.9 and 4.10, 4.11 and 4.12, which are all broken due to the same reason.
> 
> I can confirm this patch ("PCI: hv: Serialize the present and eject work items")
> can be applied cleanly to v4.13+.
> 
> PS, For Hyper-V users that want PCIe-pass-through and NIC SR-IOV on some
> certain versions of kernels, they can pick the patches here:
> https://github.com/Microsoft/azure-linux-kernel.

I'm sorry, I'm still totally confused.

What exact git commit ids do you wish to see applied to which stable
tree?

And if backporting is needed, can you send the proper patches through
email?  I can't use a random github repo at all, for obvious reasons.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]