4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
commit f5115e8869e1dfafac0e414b4f1664f3a84a4683 upstream.
When handling an SMC trap, the "preferred return address" is set
to that of the SMC, and not the next PC (which is a departure from
the behaviour of an SMC that isn't trapped).
Increment PC in the handler, as the guest is otherwise forever
stuck...
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: acfb3b883f6d ("arm64: KVM: Fix SMCCC handling of unimplemented SMC/HVC calls")
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> [v4.9 backport]
Tested-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -53,7 +53,16 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *v
static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
{
+ /*
+ * "If an SMC instruction executed at Non-secure EL1 is
+ * trapped to EL2 because HCR_EL2.TSC is 1, the exception is a
+ * Trap exception, not a Secure Monitor Call exception [...]"
+ *
+ * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would
+ * otherwise return to the same address...
+ */
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
+ kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
return 1;
}