On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 04:10:41PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 17/04/2018 14:54, Greg KH wrote: > >> There are people compiling with -Werror. But really, I sometimes wonder > >> if stable-kernel-rules.rst should be perused in the same way as the GNU > >> coding standards]. Most patches that are "auto-selected" these days are > >> (at least for KVM) exactly the "This could be a problem..." type of thing > >> that is singled out as _not_ stable-worthy. > > Are you sure -Werror shows this? And it's not just a sparse "warning"? > > This should be -Wimplicit, which is enabled by -Wall. ah, yet-another-W-option that should never be enabled :) thanks, greg k-h