On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 01:50:21PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> fixing commit: c71bf099abdd Btrfs: Avoid orphan inodes cleanup while replaying log.
>
> The bot has also determined it's probably a bug fixing patch. (score: 6.2138)
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16, v4.14.33, v4.9.93, v4.4.127.
>
> v4.16.1: Build OK!
> v4.15.16: Build OK!
> v4.14.33: Build OK!
> v4.9.93: Build failed! Errors:
> tree-log.c:2367:24: error: ‘struct btrfs_fs_info’ has no member named ‘sectorsize’
> tree-log.c:2367:24: error: ‘struct btrfs_fs_info’ has no member named ‘sectorsize’
> tree-log.c:4224:13: error: ‘struct inode’ has no member named ‘flags’; did you mean ‘i_flags’?
> tree-log.c:4229:38: error: ‘struct inode’ has no member named ‘vfs_inode’
> tree-log.c:4239:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘refcount_inc’; did you mean ‘i_readcount_inc’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
4.9 and older would need manual fixes to the patch. There are a few
refactorings but that should be easy to resolve if somebody wants to
backport port that.
>
> v4.4.127: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 0132761017e0 ("btrfs: fix string and comment grammatical issues and typos")
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{???k~????^n?r???z???h?????&???z??z?ޗ?+??+zf???h???~????i?????????z_???j:+v???)ߣ?m