4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 68fa24f9121c04ef146b5158f538c8b32f285be5 ] We should not call edac_mc_del_mc() if a corresponding call to edac_mc_add_mc() has not been performed yet. So here, we should go to err instead of err2 to branch at the right place of the error handling path. Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180107205400.14068-1-christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c @@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ static int mv64x60_mc_err_probe(struct p /* Non-ECC RAM? */ printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: No ECC DIMMs discovered\n", __func__); res = -ENODEV; - goto err2; + goto err; } edac_dbg(3, "init mci\n");