Re: [PATCH] memcg: fix per_node_info cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 10-04-18 17:55:13, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 04:01:32PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Tue 10-04-18 13:50:30, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> [This is an automated email]
> >>
> >> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> >> fixing commit: 00f3ca2c2d66 mm: memcontrol: per-lruvec stats infrastructure.
> >
> >Yes and the changelog states conditions which are quite hard to achieve
> >to have this patch in the stable tree. So I am not really convinced it
> >is worth backporting even though the patch itself is trivial.
> 
> Quite hard to achieve, but the changelog also indicated that this was
> actually hit and is not just theoretical. Is there something that will
> prevent this from happening on "real" workloads?

Well, small allocations do not really fail and it would take to
configure a really large NUMA system to achieve the same. So I am
skeptical.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]