This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled rtc: interface: Validate alarm-time before handling rollover to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: rtc-interface-validate-alarm-time-before-handling-rollover.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From foo@baz Tue Apr 10 10:31:53 CEST 2018 From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 22:18:55 +0530 Subject: rtc: interface: Validate alarm-time before handling rollover From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit da96aea0ed177105cb13ee83b328f6c61e061d3f ] In function __rtc_read_alarm() its possible for an alarm time-stamp to be invalid even after replacing missing components with current time-stamp. The condition 'alarm->time.tm_year < 70' will trigger this case and will cause the call to 'rtc_tm_to_time64(&alarm->time)' return a negative value for variable t_alm. While handling alarm rollover this negative t_alm (assumed to seconds offset from '1970-01-01 00:00:00') is converted back to rtc_time via rtc_time64_to_tm() which results in this error log with seemingly garbage values: "rtc rtc0: invalid alarm value: -2-1--1041528741 2005511117:71582844:32" This error was generated when the rtc driver (rtc-opal in this case) returned an alarm time-stamp of '00-00-00 00:00:00' to indicate that the alarm is disabled. Though I have submitted a separate fix for the rtc-opal driver, this issue may potentially impact other existing/future rtc drivers. To fix this issue the patch validates the alarm time-stamp just after filling up the missing datetime components and if rtc_valid_tm() still reports it to be invalid then bails out of the function without handling the rollover. Reported-by: Steve Best <sbest@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/rtc/interface.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/rtc/interface.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/interface.c @@ -217,6 +217,13 @@ int __rtc_read_alarm(struct rtc_device * missing = year; } + /* Can't proceed if alarm is still invalid after replacing + * missing fields. + */ + err = rtc_valid_tm(&alarm->time); + if (err) + goto done; + /* with luck, no rollover is needed */ t_now = rtc_tm_to_time64(&now); t_alm = rtc_tm_to_time64(&alarm->time); @@ -268,9 +275,9 @@ int __rtc_read_alarm(struct rtc_device * dev_warn(&rtc->dev, "alarm rollover not handled\n"); } -done: err = rtc_valid_tm(&alarm->time); +done: if (err) { dev_warn(&rtc->dev, "invalid alarm value: %d-%d-%d %d:%d:%d\n", alarm->time.tm_year + 1900, alarm->time.tm_mon + 1, Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are queue-4.4/rtc-interface-validate-alarm-time-before-handling-rollover.patch queue-4.4/rtc-opal-handle-disabled-tpo-in-opal_get_tpo_time.patch