This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
rtc: interface: Validate alarm-time before handling rollover
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
rtc-interface-validate-alarm-time-before-handling-rollover.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Apr 9 17:09:24 CEST 2018
From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 22:18:55 +0530
Subject: rtc: interface: Validate alarm-time before handling rollover
From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit da96aea0ed177105cb13ee83b328f6c61e061d3f ]
In function __rtc_read_alarm() its possible for an alarm time-stamp to
be invalid even after replacing missing components with current
time-stamp. The condition 'alarm->time.tm_year < 70' will trigger this
case and will cause the call to 'rtc_tm_to_time64(&alarm->time)'
return a negative value for variable t_alm.
While handling alarm rollover this negative t_alm (assumed to seconds
offset from '1970-01-01 00:00:00') is converted back to rtc_time via
rtc_time64_to_tm() which results in this error log with seemingly
garbage values:
"rtc rtc0: invalid alarm value: -2-1--1041528741
2005511117:71582844:32"
This error was generated when the rtc driver (rtc-opal in this case)
returned an alarm time-stamp of '00-00-00 00:00:00' to indicate that
the alarm is disabled. Though I have submitted a separate fix for the
rtc-opal driver, this issue may potentially impact other
existing/future rtc drivers.
To fix this issue the patch validates the alarm time-stamp just after
filling up the missing datetime components and if rtc_valid_tm() still
reports it to be invalid then bails out of the function without
handling the rollover.
Reported-by: Steve Best <sbest@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/rtc/interface.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/rtc/interface.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/interface.c
@@ -227,6 +227,13 @@ int __rtc_read_alarm(struct rtc_device *
missing = year;
}
+ /* Can't proceed if alarm is still invalid after replacing
+ * missing fields.
+ */
+ err = rtc_valid_tm(&alarm->time);
+ if (err)
+ goto done;
+
/* with luck, no rollover is needed */
t_now = rtc_tm_to_time64(&now);
t_alm = rtc_tm_to_time64(&alarm->time);
@@ -278,9 +285,9 @@ int __rtc_read_alarm(struct rtc_device *
dev_warn(&rtc->dev, "alarm rollover not handled\n");
}
-done:
err = rtc_valid_tm(&alarm->time);
+done:
if (err) {
dev_warn(&rtc->dev, "invalid alarm value: %d-%d-%d %d:%d:%d\n",
alarm->time.tm_year + 1900, alarm->time.tm_mon + 1,
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from vaibhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
queue-4.9/rtc-interface-validate-alarm-time-before-handling-rollover.patch
queue-4.9/rtc-opal-handle-disabled-tpo-in-opal_get_tpo_time.patch