Hi Aniruddha,
On 28/03/18 09:54, Aniruddha Banerjee wrote:
> The kernel documentation states that the locking of the irq-chip
> registers should be handled by the irq-chip driver. In the irq-gic,
> the accesses to the irqchip are seemingly not protected and multiple
> writes to SPIs from different irq descriptors do RMW requests without
> taking the irq-chip lock. When multiple irqs call the request_irq at
> the same time, there can be a simultaneous write at the gic
> distributor, leading to a race. Acquire the gic_lock when the
> irq_type is updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aniruddha Banerjee <aniruddhab@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes from V1:
>
> * Moved the spinlock from irq-gic to irq-gic common, so that the fix
> is valid for GIC v1/v2/v3.
>
> Change from V2:
>
> * Fixup the Signed-off-by line.
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c
> index 9ae71804b5dd..73dd39959e6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
>
> #include "irq-gic-common.h"
>
> +static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(irq_controller_lock);
> +
> static const struct gic_kvm_info *gic_kvm_info;
>
> const struct gic_kvm_info *gic_get_kvm_info(void)
> @@ -57,6 +59,7 @@ int gic_configure_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type,
> * Read current configuration register, and insert the config
> * for "irq", depending on "type".
> */
> + raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> val = oldval = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + confoff);
> if (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK)
> val &= ~confmask;
> @@ -64,8 +67,10 @@ int gic_configure_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type,
> val |= confmask;
>
> /* If the current configuration is the same, then we are done */
> - if (val == oldval)
> + if (val == oldval) {
> + raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
> return 0;
> + }
>
> /*
> * Write back the new configuration, and possibly re-enable
> @@ -83,6 +88,7 @@ int gic_configure_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type,
> pr_warn("GIC: PPI%d is secure or misconfigured\n",
> irq - 16);
> }
> + raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
>
> if (sync_access)
> sync_access();
>
I've just realized a potential issue: As interrupts are not disabled
here, you could take one in the middle of this critical section. If the
interrupt handler has the stupid idea to change the trigger type of
*any* interrupt, we deadlock.
Yes, this would be a very stupid idea, but better safe than sorry.
Please use raw_pin_lock_irqsave/irqrestore instead.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...