On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 05:52:17PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 03:14:05PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:34:44PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > -------------------------------- > > > NOTE: This is going to be the next-to-last 3.0.x release that I do. > > > You should be moving off to the 3.4.x or 3.10.x longterm kernels > > > by now, and not use the 3.0.x kernel unless you have to for some > > > reason. If anyone has any problems with this, please let me know. > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.100 release. > > > There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sun Oct 13 19:30:52 UTC 2013. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.100-rc1.gz > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > Due to a powerpc build breakage in -rc1, I've reverted one patch and > > created a -rc2 patch: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.100-rc2.gz > > > > Build results for -rc2: > total: 98 pass: 71 skipped: 16 fail: 11 > > qemu tests all pass. > > Results are as expected. Great, thanks for testing -rc2 and letting me know. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html