4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit d087f15786021a9605b20f4c678312510be4cac1 ]
Register layout of a typical TPCC_EVT_MUX_M_N register is such that the
lowest numbered event is at the lowest byte address and highest numbered
event at highest byte address. But TPCC_EVT_MUX_60_63 register layout is
different, in that the lowest numbered event is at the highest address
and highest numbered event is at the lowest address. Therefore, modify
ti_am335x_xbar_write() to handle TPCC_EVT_MUX_60_63 register
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
@@ -54,7 +54,15 @@ struct ti_am335x_xbar_map {
static inline void ti_am335x_xbar_write(void __iomem *iomem, int event, u8 val)
{
- writeb_relaxed(val, iomem + event);
+ /*
+ * TPCC_EVT_MUX_60_63 register layout is different than the
+ * rest, in the sense, that event 63 is mapped to lowest byte
+ * and event 60 is mapped to highest, handle it separately.
+ */
+ if (event >= 60 && event <= 63)
+ writeb_relaxed(val, iomem + (63 - event % 4));
+ else
+ writeb_relaxed(val, iomem + event);
}
static void ti_am335x_xbar_free(struct device *dev, void *route_data)