4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 73e64fa4f417b22d8d5521999a631ced8e2d442e ] We will not be able to send packets over a channel that has been rescinded. Make necessary adjustments so we can properly cleanup even when the channel is rescinded. This issue can be trigerred in the NIC hot-remove path. Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c @@ -151,6 +151,13 @@ static void netvsc_destroy_buf(struct hv sizeof(struct nvsp_message), (unsigned long)revoke_packet, VM_PKT_DATA_INBAND, 0); + /* If the failure is because the channel is rescinded; + * ignore the failure since we cannot send on a rescinded + * channel. This would allow us to properly cleanup + * even when the channel is rescinded. + */ + if (device->channel->rescind) + ret = 0; /* * If we failed here, we might as well return and * have a leak rather than continue and a bugchk @@ -211,6 +218,15 @@ static void netvsc_destroy_buf(struct hv sizeof(struct nvsp_message), (unsigned long)revoke_packet, VM_PKT_DATA_INBAND, 0); + + /* If the failure is because the channel is rescinded; + * ignore the failure since we cannot send on a rescinded + * channel. This would allow us to properly cleanup + * even when the channel is rescinded. + */ + if (device->channel->rescind) + ret = 0; + /* If we failed here, we might as well return and * have a leak rather than continue and a bugchk */