On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 08:04:34PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:48:00PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 5609b80a37f69f796548339e675256188b29c17d ]
>>
>> It is valid to install routes with a nexthop device that does not have a
>> carrier, so we need to make sure they're marked accordingly.
>>
>> As explained in the previous patch, host and anycast routes are never
>> marked with the 'linkdown' flag.
>>
>> Note that reject routes are unaffected, as these use the loopback device
>> which always has a carrier.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Hi Sasha,
>
>It doesn't really make sense to take this patch to 4.15 (and 4.14 from
>your other mail). The flag is never used there.
>
>In these kernels the flag is dumped to user space based on a carrier
>check. See commit 44c9f2f206f8 ("ipv6: Check nexthop flags in route dump
>instead of carrier").
>
>Similarly, during route lookup the carrier is checked and not the flag.
>See commit 14c5206c2d02 ("ipv6: Check nexthop flags during route lookup
>instead of carrier").
Removed from both trees, thanks!
--
Thanks,
Sasha