Re: [PATCH v2] block: Change a rcu_read_{lock,unlock}_sched() pair into rcu_read_{lock,unlock}()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/19/18 12:46 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> scsi_device_quiesce() uses synchronize_rcu() to guarantee that the
> effect of blk_set_preempt_only() will be visible for percpu_ref_tryget()
> calls that occur after the queue unfreeze by using the approach
> explained in https://lwn.net/Articles/573497/. The rcu read lock and
> unlock calls in blk_queue_enter() form a pair with the synchronize_rcu()
> call in scsi_device_quiesce(). Both scsi_device_quiesce() and
> blk_queue_enter() must either use regular RCU or RCU-sched.
> Since neither the RCU-protected code in blk_queue_enter() nor
> blk_queue_usage_counter_release() sleeps, regular RCU protection
> is sufficient. Note: scsi_device_quiesce() does not have to be
> modified since it already uses synchronize_rcu().

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]