Artem, Am Donnerstag, 8. März 2018, 16:01:15 CET schrieb Artem Bityutskiy: > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 15:43 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > As stated by David Woodhouse, it was a huge mistake by UBI to not > > reject MLC > > NAND from the very beginning. > > Correction: when we were developing UBI/UBIFS and upstreamed them, MLC > was widely used yet we did not really know about it. So there was > nothing to reject yet. You mean *not* widely used? > The mistake is that we did not add the reject timely. When people > started reporting MLC issues we were answering that UBI/UBIFS stack > needs more work to make MLC safe to use, and we hoped someone would do > the work. True. TBH Boris and I also thought that adding MLC support is not a that big deal... Thanks, //richard