On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 03:56:36PM +0000, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > The problem is that it's the first of its kind in regard to virtual > slaves/devices and many of the consumers of block device sysfs simply > weren't ready for it to appear where it did. Perhaps if it had been a > different part of sysfs hierarchy and/or linked up a different way > (virtual-slaves/?) it would have been invisible to programs that > weren't ready to consume it... Yes, I think we should simply creates a paths/ directory. Not sure there is much point in the backlink.