On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:22 AM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Gen8 and prior Proliant systems supported the "CRU" interface
> to firmware. This interfaces allows linux to "call back" into firmware
> to source the cause of an NMI. This feature isn't fully utilized
> as the actual source of the NMI isn't printed, the driver only
> indicates that the source couldn't be determined when the call
> fails.
>
> With the advent of Gen9, iCRU replaces the CRU. The call back
> feature is no longer available in firmware. To be compatible and
> not attempt to call back into firmware on system not supporting CRU,
> the SMBIOS table is consulted to determine if it is safe to
> make the call back or not.
>
> This results in about half of the driver code being devoted
> to either making CRU calls or determing if it is safe to make
> CRU calls. As noted, the driver isn't really using the results of
> the CRU calls.
>
> Furthermore, as a consequence of the Spectre security issue, the
> BIOS/EFI calls are being wrapped into Spectre-disabling section.
> Removing the call back in hpwdt_pretimeout assists in this effort.
>
> As the CRU sourcing of the NMI isn't required for handling the
> NMI and there are security concerns with making the call back, remove
> the legacy (pre Gen9) NMI sourcing and the DMI code to determine if
> the system had the CRU interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@xxxxxxx>
This avoids a warning in mainline kernels, so that's great:
drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x24: indirect call
found in RETPOLINE build
I wonder what we do about stable kernels. Are both this patch and the patch
that added the objtool warning message candidates for backports to
stable kernels?
Arnd