The patch below does not apply to the 3.18-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 1a932ef4e47984dee227834667b5ff5a334e4805 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:02:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix use-after-free on root->orphan_block_rsv
I got these from running generic/475,
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 26384 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:3326 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0x1ac/0x2b0 [btrfs]
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
IP: btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1c/0x70 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
btrfs_orphan_release_metadata+0x9f/0x200 [btrfs]
btrfs_orphan_del+0x10d/0x170 [btrfs]
btrfs_setattr+0x500/0x640 [btrfs]
notify_change+0x7ae/0x870
do_truncate+0xca/0x130
vfs_truncate+0x2ee/0x3d0
do_sys_truncate+0xaf/0xf0
SyS_truncate+0xe/0x10
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0x96
The race is between btrfs_orphan_commit_root and btrfs_orphan_del,
t1 t2
btrfs_orphan_commit_root btrfs_orphan_del
spin_lock
check (&root->orphan_inodes)
root->orphan_block_rsv = NULL;
spin_unlock
atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
access root->orphan_block_rsv
Accessing root->orphan_block_rsv must be done before decreasing
root->orphan_inodes.
cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> v3.12+
Fixes: 703c88e03524 ("Btrfs: fix tracking of orphan inode count")
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 44a152d8f32f..29b491328f4e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3387,6 +3387,11 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
ret = btrfs_orphan_reserve_metadata(trans, inode);
ASSERT(!ret);
if (ret) {
+ /*
+ * dec doesn't need spin_lock as ->orphan_block_rsv
+ * would be released only if ->orphan_inodes is
+ * zero.
+ */
atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
&inode->runtime_flags);
@@ -3401,12 +3406,17 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
if (insert >= 1) {
ret = btrfs_insert_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
if (ret) {
- atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
if (reserve) {
clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
&inode->runtime_flags);
btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
}
+ /*
+ * btrfs_orphan_commit_root may race with us and set
+ * ->orphan_block_rsv to zero, in order to avoid that,
+ * decrease ->orphan_inodes after everything is done.
+ */
+ atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
if (ret != -EEXIST) {
clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
&inode->runtime_flags);
@@ -3438,28 +3448,26 @@ static int btrfs_orphan_del(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
{
struct btrfs_root *root = inode->root;
int delete_item = 0;
- int release_rsv = 0;
int ret = 0;
- spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
if (test_and_clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
&inode->runtime_flags))
delete_item = 1;
+ if (delete_item && trans)
+ ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
+
if (test_and_clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
&inode->runtime_flags))
- release_rsv = 1;
- spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
+ btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
- if (delete_item) {
+ /*
+ * btrfs_orphan_commit_root may race with us and set ->orphan_block_rsv
+ * to zero, in order to avoid that, decrease ->orphan_inodes after
+ * everything is done.
+ */
+ if (delete_item)
atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
- if (trans)
- ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root,
- btrfs_ino(inode));
- }
-
- if (release_rsv)
- btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
return ret;
}