4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
Commit 90348689d500 upstream.
For those CPUs that require PSCI to perform a BP invalidation,
going all the way to the PSCI code for not much is a waste of
precious cycles. Let's terminate that call as early as possible.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/jump_label.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/psci.h>
#include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
@@ -322,6 +323,18 @@ again:
if (exit_code == ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP && !__populate_fault_info(vcpu))
goto again;
+ if (exit_code == ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP &&
+ (kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64 ||
+ kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC32) &&
+ vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0) == PSCI_0_2_FN_PSCI_VERSION) {
+ u64 val = PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+ if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2, vcpu->arch.features))
+ val = 2;
+
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, val);
+ goto again;
+ }
+
if (static_branch_unlikely(&vgic_v2_cpuif_trap) &&
exit_code == ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP) {
bool valid;