On 14 February 2018 at 14:24, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 14 February 2018 at 13:54, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:38:01AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>> Hi Greg, >>> >>> As mentioned by Will, I have created the v4.14 counterpart of his stable >>> backport of the arm64/ARM Spectre/Meltdown mitigations that have been pulled >>> into v4.16-rc1. >>> >>> Given that this is the v4.15 version backported to v4.14, I have removed any >>> mention of 'conflicts' from the commit logs as they are now ambiguous. The >>> patches applied surprisingly cleanly, I only needed to drop two patches that >>> are already in (the same ones Will mentioned in his PR), and drop another one >>> dealing with SPE, support for which did not exist yet in v4.14. I also included >>> the patch >>> >>> arm64: move TASK_* definitions to <asm/processor.h> >>> >>> from v4.15 to make Robin's Spectre v1 patches apply more cleanly. >> >> I've queued these up now, but if you could pull the whole quilt tree and >> verify I got things right, that would be great. There was some >> conflicts with a few previous patches I had already queued up that >> touched some "Falkor" errata code. >> >> Specifically 932b50c7c1c65e6f23002e075b97ee083c4a9e71 "arm64: Add >> software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041" is the offending patch. I >> think I resolved the merge issues properly, but verifying this would be >> wonderful. >> > > No, the build is broken now. I will investigate. Your patch 977c3d2cb684e143a18e1564fbf5ecf7576a1c98 arm64: Move post_ttbr_update_workaround to C code removes the pre_disable_mmu_workaround macro from asm/assembler.h but it should only remove post_ttbr_update_workaround Once I add that back, things seem to build and run as expected. Thanks, Ard.