3.2.99-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 8ee031631546cf2f7859cc69593bd60bbdd70b46 upstream.
Commit fd2421f54423 ("fs/9p: When doing inode lookup compare qid details
and inode mode bits.") transformed v9fs_qid_iget() to use iget5_locked()
instead of iget_locked(). However, the test() callback is not checking
fid.path at all, which means that a lookup in the inode cache can now
accidentally locate a completely wrong inode from the same inode hash
bucket if the other fields (qid.type and qid.version) match.
Fixes: fd2421f54423 ("fs/9p: When doing inode lookup compare qid details and inode mode bits.")
Reviewed-by: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 3 +++
fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
@@ -469,6 +469,9 @@ static int v9fs_test_inode(struct inode
if (v9inode->qid.type != st->qid.type)
return 0;
+
+ if (v9inode->qid.path != st->qid.path)
+ return 0;
return 1;
}
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c
@@ -105,6 +105,9 @@ static int v9fs_test_inode_dotl(struct i
if (v9inode->qid.type != st->qid.type)
return 0;
+
+ if (v9inode->qid.path != st->qid.path)
+ return 0;
return 1;
}