3.16.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit f6c8a317ab208aee223776327c06f23342492d54 upstream.
Source code review for a specific software refactoring showed the need
for another correction because the error code "-1" was returned so far
if a call of the function "sony_call_snc_handle" failed here.
Thus assign the return value from these two function calls also to
the variable "err" and provide it in case of a failure.
Fixes: d6f15ed876b83a1a0eba1d0473eef58acc95444a ("sony-laptop: use soft rfkill status stored in hw")
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/31/463
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<CAHp75VcMkXCioCzmLE0+BTmkqc5RSOx9yPO0ectVHMrMvewgwg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
@@ -1654,17 +1654,19 @@ static int sony_nc_setup_rfkill(struct a
if (!rfk)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (sony_call_snc_handle(sony_rfkill_handle, 0x200, &result) < 0) {
+ err = sony_call_snc_handle(sony_rfkill_handle, 0x200, &result);
+ if (err < 0) {
rfkill_destroy(rfk);
- return -1;
+ return err;
}
hwblock = !(result & 0x1);
- if (sony_call_snc_handle(sony_rfkill_handle,
- sony_rfkill_address[nc_type],
- &result) < 0) {
+ err = sony_call_snc_handle(sony_rfkill_handle,
+ sony_rfkill_address[nc_type],
+ &result);
+ if (err < 0) {
rfkill_destroy(rfk);
- return -1;
+ return err;
}
swblock = !(result & 0x2);