4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit a97cb0e7b3f4c6297fd857055ae8e895f402f501 upstream.
Both Geert and DaveJ reported that the recent futex commit:
c1e2f0eaf015 ("futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex")
introduced a problem with setting OWNER_DEAD. We set the bit on an
uninitialized variable and then entirely optimize it away as a
dead-store.
Move the setting of the bit to where it is more useful.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: c1e2f0eaf015 ("futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180122103947.GD2228@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/futex.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -2311,9 +2311,6 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __us
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
oldowner = pi_state->owner;
- /* Owner died? */
- if (!pi_state->owner)
- newtid |= FUTEX_OWNER_DIED;
/*
* We are here because either:
@@ -2374,6 +2371,9 @@ retry:
}
newtid = task_pid_vnr(newowner) | FUTEX_WAITERS;
+ /* Owner died? */
+ if (!pi_state->owner)
+ newtid |= FUTEX_OWNER_DIED;
if (get_futex_value_locked(&uval, uaddr))
goto handle_fault;