4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 091f02483df7b56615b524491f404e574c5e0668 upstream.
As per 90caccdd8cc0 ("bpf: fix bpf_tail_call() x64 JIT"), the index used
for array lookup is defined to be 32-bit wide. Update a misleading
comment that suggests it is 64-bit wide.
Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit
emit_a32_mov_i(tmp[1], off, false, ctx);
emit(ARM_LDR_I(tmp2[1], ARM_SP, STACK_VAR(r2[1])), ctx);
emit(ARM_LDR_R(tmp[1], tmp2[1], tmp[1]), ctx);
- /* index (64 bit) */
+ /* index is 32-bit for arrays */
emit(ARM_LDR_I(tmp2[1], ARM_SP, STACK_VAR(r3[1])), ctx);
/* index >= array->map.max_entries */
emit(ARM_CMP_R(tmp2[1], tmp[1]), ctx);