From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> [ upstream commit c366287ebd698ef5e3de300d90cd62ee9ee7373e ] Divides by zero are not nice, lets avoid them if possible. Also do_div() seems not needed when dealing with 32bit operands, but this seems a minor detail. Fixes: bd4cf0ed331a ("net: filter: rework/optimize internal BPF interpreter's instruction set") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/bpf/core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index aaa4424..2246115 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ static unsigned int ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, DST = tmp; CONT; ALU_MOD_X: - if (unlikely(SRC == 0)) + if (unlikely((u32)SRC == 0)) return 0; tmp = (u32) DST; DST = do_div(tmp, (u32) SRC); @@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ static unsigned int ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, DST = div64_u64(DST, SRC); CONT; ALU_DIV_X: - if (unlikely(SRC == 0)) + if (unlikely((u32)SRC == 0)) return 0; tmp = (u32) DST; do_div(tmp, (u32) SRC); -- 2.9.5