On 01/24/2018 11:07 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 22:39 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >> On 01/09/2018 07:04 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: >>> >>> The BPF interpreter has been used as part of the spectre 2 attack CVE-2017-5715. >>> >>> A quote from goolge project zero blog: >>> "At this point, it would normally be necessary to locate gadgets in >>> the host kernel code that can be used to actually leak data by reading >>> from an attacker-controlled location, shifting and masking the result >>> appropriately and then using the result of that as offset to an >>> attacker-controlled address for a load. But piecing gadgets together >>> and figuring out which ones work in a speculation context seems annoying. >>> So instead, we decided to use the eBPF interpreter, which is built into >>> the host kernel - while there is no legitimate way to invoke it from inside >>> a VM, the presence of the code in the host kernel's text section is sufficient >>> to make it usable for the attack, just like with ordinary ROP gadgets." >>> >>> To make attacker job harder introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config >>> option that removes interpreter from the kernel in favor of JIT-only mode. >>> So far eBPF JIT is supported by: >>> x64, arm64, arm32, sparc64, s390, powerpc64, mips64 >>> >>> The start of JITed program is randomized and code page is marked as read-only. >>> In addition "constant blinding" can be turned on with net.core.bpf_jit_harden >>> >>> v2->v3: >>> - move __bpf_prog_ret0 under ifdef (Daniel) >>> >>> v1->v2: >>> - fix init order, test_bpf and cBPF (Daniel's feedback) >>> - fix offloaded bpf (Jakub's feedback) >>> - add 'return 0' dummy in case something can invoke prog->bpf_func >>> - retarget bpf tree. For bpf-next the patch would need one extra hunk. >>> It will be sent when the trees are merged back to net-next >>> >>> Considered doing: >>> int bpf_jit_enable __read_mostly = BPF_EBPF_JIT_DEFAULT; >>> but it seems better to land the patch as-is and in bpf-next remove >>> bpf_jit_enable global variable from all JITs, consolidate in one place >>> and remove this jit_init() function. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Applied to bpf tree, thanks Alexei! > > For stable too? Yes, this will go into stable as well; batch of backports will come Thurs/Fri.