Hi Greg, On 23 January 2018 at 12:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 01:19:07AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: >> On 22 January 2018 at 14:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.113 release. >> > There are 53 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> > let me know. >> > >> > Responses should be made by Wed Jan 24 08:38:52 UTC 2018. >> > Anything received after that time might be too late. >> > >> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.113-rc1.gz >> > or in the git tree and branch at: >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y >> > and the diffstat can be found below. >> > >> > thanks, >> > >> > greg k-h >> >> Results from Linaro’s test farm. >> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64. > > Thanks for letting me know how they all worked. > >> NOTE: >> On arm64 Hikey620 device cpufreq test failed. >> We are suspecting due to missing config on Hikey620 >> CONFIG_HI6220_MBOX=y >> You may ignore this now. because it is coming from internal tree. >> https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git > > Is this new? That shouldn't have been something that changed in this > kernel release, maybe a few releases ago? There has been a push to sync > some of the hikey patches into the stable tree to make testing like this > easier for you to do, hopefully it isn't breaking anything... This is a 'new' one, due to me changing over to a tree with minimal hikey patches for stable and stable-rc testing. I missed to cherry pick the hikey mailbox driver patch. With that corrected, we are back to the same numbers, and the cpufreq tests also pass. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Best, Sumit.