This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
bpf: refactor fixup_bpf_calls()
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
bpf-refactor-fixup_bpf_calls.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 79741b3bdec01a8628368fbcfccc7d189ed606cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:26:40 -0700
Subject: bpf: refactor fixup_bpf_calls()
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxx>
commit 79741b3bdec01a8628368fbcfccc7d189ed606cb upstream.
reduce indent and make it iterate over instructions similar to
convert_ctx_accesses(). Also convert hard BUG_ON into soft verifier error.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
[Backported to 4.9.y - gregkh]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -3362,55 +3362,50 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct b
return 0;
}
-/* fixup insn->imm field of bpf_call instructions:
- * if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem)
- * insn->imm = bpf_map_lookup_elem - __bpf_call_base;
- * else if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem)
- * insn->imm = bpf_map_update_elem - __bpf_call_base;
- * else ...
+/* fixup insn->imm field of bpf_call instructions
*
* this function is called after eBPF program passed verification
*/
-static void fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
{
+ struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
+ struct bpf_insn *insn = prog->insnsi;
const struct bpf_func_proto *fn;
+ const int insn_cnt = prog->len;
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
- struct bpf_insn *insn = &prog->insnsi[i];
-
- if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL)) {
- /* we reach here when program has bpf_call instructions
- * and it passed bpf_check(), means that
- * ops->get_func_proto must have been supplied, check it
- */
- BUG_ON(!prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto);
-
- if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_route_realm)
- prog->dst_needed = 1;
- if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32)
- bpf_user_rnd_init_once();
- if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call) {
- /* mark bpf_tail_call as different opcode
- * to avoid conditional branch in
- * interpeter for every normal call
- * and to prevent accidental JITing by
- * JIT compiler that doesn't support
- * bpf_tail_call yet
- */
- insn->imm = 0;
- insn->code |= BPF_X;
- continue;
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
+ if (insn->code != (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL))
+ continue;
+
+ if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_route_realm)
+ prog->dst_needed = 1;
+ if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32)
+ bpf_user_rnd_init_once();
+ if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call) {
+ /* mark bpf_tail_call as different opcode to avoid
+ * conditional branch in the interpeter for every normal
+ * call and to prevent accidental JITing by JIT compiler
+ * that doesn't support bpf_tail_call yet
+ */
+ insn->imm = 0;
+ insn->code |= BPF_X;
+ continue;
+ }
- fn = prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto(insn->imm);
- /* all functions that have prototype and verifier allowed
- * programs to call them, must be real in-kernel functions
- */
- BUG_ON(!fn->func);
- insn->imm = fn->func - __bpf_call_base;
+ fn = prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto(insn->imm);
+ /* all functions that have prototype and verifier allowed
+ * programs to call them, must be real in-kernel functions
+ */
+ if (!fn->func) {
+ verbose("kernel subsystem misconfigured func %d\n",
+ insn->imm);
+ return -EFAULT;
}
+ insn->imm = fn->func - __bpf_call_base;
}
+
+ return 0;
}
static void free_states(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
@@ -3515,7 +3510,7 @@ skip_full_check:
ret = convert_ctx_accesses(env);
if (ret == 0)
- fixup_bpf_calls(env->prog);
+ ret = fixup_bpf_calls(env);
if (log_level && log_len >= log_size - 1) {
BUG_ON(log_len >= log_size);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ast@xxxxxx are
queue-4.9/bpf-refactor-fixup_bpf_calls.patch
queue-4.9/bpf-move-fixup_bpf_calls-function.patch