4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit ad3cbf61332914711e5f506972b1dc9af8d62146 ]
Make sure to check both return code fields before processing the
response. Otherwise we risk operating on invalid data.
Fixes: c9475369bd2b ("s390/qeth: rework RX/TX checksum offload")
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -5445,6 +5445,13 @@ out:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qeth_poll);
+static int qeth_setassparms_inspect_rc(struct qeth_ipa_cmd *cmd)
+{
+ if (!cmd->hdr.return_code)
+ cmd->hdr.return_code = cmd->data.setassparms.hdr.return_code;
+ return cmd->hdr.return_code;
+}
+
int qeth_setassparms_cb(struct qeth_card *card,
struct qeth_reply *reply, unsigned long data)
{
@@ -6304,7 +6311,7 @@ static int qeth_ipa_checksum_run_cmd_cb(
(struct qeth_checksum_cmd *)reply->param;
QETH_CARD_TEXT(card, 4, "chkdoccb");
- if (cmd->hdr.return_code)
+ if (qeth_setassparms_inspect_rc(cmd))
return 0;
memset(chksum_cb, 0, sizeof(*chksum_cb));