Patch "skbuff: in skb_copy_ubufs unclone before releasing zerocopy" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    skbuff: in skb_copy_ubufs unclone before releasing zerocopy

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     skbuff-in-skb_copy_ubufs-unclone-before-releasing-zerocopy.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From foo@baz Sun Dec 31 11:12:48 CET 2017
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 12:38:13 -0500
Subject: skbuff: in skb_copy_ubufs unclone before releasing zerocopy

From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx>


skb_copy_ubufs must unclone before it is safe to modify its
skb_shared_info with skb_zcopy_clear.

Commit b90ddd568792 ("skbuff: skb_copy_ubufs must release uarg even
without user frags") ensures that all skbs release their zerocopy
state, even those without frags.

But I forgot an edge case where such an skb arrives that is cloned.

The stack does not build such packets. Vhost/tun skbs have their
frags orphaned before cloning. TCP skbs only attach zerocopy state
when a frag is added.

But if TCP packets can be trimmed or linearized, this might occur.
Tracing the code I found no instance so far (e.g., skb_linearize
ends up calling skb_zcopy_clear if !skb->data_len).

Still, it is non-obvious that no path exists. And it is fragile to
rely on this.

Fixes: b90ddd568792 ("skbuff: skb_copy_ubufs must release uarg even without user frags")
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -1181,12 +1181,12 @@ int skb_copy_ubufs(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	int i, new_frags;
 	u32 d_off;
 
-	if (!num_frags)
-		goto release;
-
 	if (skb_shared(skb) || skb_unclone(skb, gfp_mask))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (!num_frags)
+		goto release;
+
 	new_frags = (__skb_pagelen(skb) + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	for (i = 0; i < new_frags; i++) {
 		page = alloc_page(gfp_mask);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from willemb@xxxxxxxxxx are

queue-4.14/skbuff-skb_copy_ubufs-must-release-uarg-even-without-user-frags.patch
queue-4.14/sock-free-skb-in-skb_complete_tx_timestamp-on-error.patch
queue-4.14/skbuff-orphan-frags-before-zerocopy-clone.patch
queue-4.14/skbuff-in-skb_copy_ubufs-unclone-before-releasing-zerocopy.patch



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]