3.2.97-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 62c49cc976af84cb0ffcb5ec07ee88da1a94e222 upstream.
It turned to be totally unneeded. The reason the code was introduced is
so that KVM can prefault swapped in page, but prefault can fail even
if mm is pinned since page table can change anyway. KVM handles this
situation correctly though and does not inject spurious page faults.
Fixes:
"INFO: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected" warning while
running LTP inside a KVM guest using the recent -next kernel.
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
@@ -91,7 +91,6 @@ struct kvm_task_sleep_node {
u32 token;
int cpu;
bool halted;
- struct mm_struct *mm;
};
static struct kvm_task_sleep_head {
@@ -138,9 +137,7 @@ void kvm_async_pf_task_wait(u32 token)
n.token = token;
n.cpu = smp_processor_id();
- n.mm = current->active_mm;
n.halted = idle || preempt_count() > 1;
- atomic_inc(&n.mm->mm_count);
init_waitqueue_head(&n.wq);
hlist_add_head(&n.link, &b->list);
spin_unlock(&b->lock);
@@ -173,9 +170,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_async_pf_task_wait
static void apf_task_wake_one(struct kvm_task_sleep_node *n)
{
hlist_del_init(&n->link);
- if (!n->mm)
- return;
- mmdrop(n->mm);
if (n->halted)
smp_send_reschedule(n->cpu);
else if (waitqueue_active(&n->wq))
@@ -219,7 +213,7 @@ again:
* async PF was not yet handled.
* Add dummy entry for the token.
*/
- n = kmalloc(sizeof(*n), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ n = kzalloc(sizeof(*n), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!n) {
/*
* Allocation failed! Busy wait while other cpu
@@ -231,7 +225,6 @@ again:
}
n->token = token;
n->cpu = smp_processor_id();
- n->mm = NULL;
init_waitqueue_head(&n->wq);
hlist_add_head(&n->link, &b->list);
} else