On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 09:41:44AM -0600, minyard@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This reverts commit c97e41076a298dbc4e910c33048e553658388eed.
>
> A backport was requested of c0a32fe13cd32 "ipmi_si: fix memory leak on
> new_smi", but the backport shouldn't have been done. This change needs
> to be reverted, as it can result in an oops and the previous code is
> correct.
>
> Reverts: c97e41076a29 ("ipmi_si: fix memory leak on new_smi")
> Link: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1757130#p1757130
> Reported-by: Neil Romig <neil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> This is for 4.14 stable tree only. In hindsight, I should scrutinize
> stable kernel requests from others in the IPMI tree. Sorry about that.
I just queued this patch up from someone else already. Thanks for it,
and sorry for the problems.
greg k-h
>
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> index e1cbb78..c04aa11 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> @@ -3469,7 +3469,6 @@ static int add_smi(struct smi_info *new_smi)
> ipmi_addr_src_to_str(new_smi->addr_source),
> si_to_str[new_smi->si_type]);
> rv = -EBUSY;
> - kfree(new_smi);
> goto out_err;
> }
> }
> --
> 2.7.4