On 12/23/2017 08:26 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 08:13:48AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 12/23/2017 06:46 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 10:19:32AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:18:31AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:41AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.108 release.
There are 78 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun Dec 24 08:45:30 UTC 2017.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
I lost track with versions. This is with v4.4.107-79-g0989207.
Build results:
total: 145 pass: 144 fail: 1
Failed builds:
alpha:allmodconfig
Qemu test results:
total: 118 pass: 118 fail: 0
alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'ev5_switch_mm':
arch/alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h:158:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'task_thread_info'
arch/alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h:158:24: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'init_new_context':
arch/alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h:236:24: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
arch/alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'enter_lazy_tlb':
arch/alpha/include/asm/mmu_context.h:250:23: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
Didn't I already report this ?
I thought that was a 4.9 issue. Let me look into this later today,
thanks for the report...
Hm, yeah, looks to be the same issue that 4.9 had. I resolve that by
ripping out the whole series, which I don't want to do here. Let me see
if I can resolve it simpler...
Apply 8ee912dab95f ("alpha: fix build failures") and fix conflict by picking
the new include files. I am currently rebuilding with that applied to ensure
that it breaks nothing else.
Now added, and pushed out, let me know how that goes.
Confirmed fixed. I'll send a complete build report later.
Again, many thanks for your help here,
My pleasure. And pure self-interest, of course. After all, I can hardly argue
for stable release merges if stable is broken.
Thanks,
Guenter