4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@xxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit dbe4d69d252e9e65c6c46826980b77b11a142065 ]
The spec for the pca9546 was missing. This chip is the same as the pca9545
except that it lacks interrupt lines. While the i2c_device_id table mapped
the pca9546 to the pca9545 definition the compatible table did not.
Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
@@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ static const struct chip_desc chips[] =
.nchans = 4,
.muxtype = pca954x_isswi,
},
+ [pca_9546] = {
+ .nchans = 4,
+ .muxtype = pca954x_isswi,
+ },
[pca_9547] = {
.nchans = 8,
.enable = 0x8,
@@ -113,7 +117,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id pca954
{ "pca9543", pca_9543 },
{ "pca9544", pca_9544 },
{ "pca9545", pca_9545 },
- { "pca9546", pca_9545 },
+ { "pca9546", pca_9546 },
{ "pca9547", pca_9547 },
{ "pca9548", pca_9548 },
{ }