This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled Btrfs: fix an integer overflow check to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: btrfs-fix-an-integer-overflow-check.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From foo@baz Thu Dec 21 09:02:40 CET 2017 From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 23:51:20 +0300 Subject: Btrfs: fix an integer overflow check From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 457ae7268b29c33dee1c0feb143a15f6029d177b ] This isn't super serious because you need CAP_ADMIN to run this code. I added this integer overflow check last year but apparently I am rubbish at writing integer overflow checks... There are two issues. First, access_ok() works on unsigned long type and not u64 so on 32 bit systems the access_ok() could be checking a truncated size. The other issue is that we should be using a stricter limit so we don't overflow the kzalloc() setting ctx->clone_roots later in the function after the access_ok(): alloc_size = sizeof(struct clone_root) * (arg->clone_sources_count + 1); sctx->clone_roots = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN); Fixes: f5ecec3ce21f ("btrfs: send: silence an integer overflow warning") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> [ added comment ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/btrfs/send.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/send.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c @@ -6196,8 +6196,13 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_f goto out; } + /* + * Check that we don't overflow at later allocations, we request + * clone_sources_count + 1 items, and compare to unsigned long inside + * access_ok. + */ if (arg->clone_sources_count > - ULLONG_MAX / sizeof(*arg->clone_sources)) { + ULONG_MAX / sizeof(struct clone_root) - 1) { ret = -EINVAL; goto out; } Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx are queue-4.9/bna-integer-overflow-bug-in-debugfs.patch queue-4.9/btrfs-fix-an-integer-overflow-check.patch queue-4.9/ib-rxe-double-free-on-error.patch